Here’s a bold statement to kick things off: The future of the Philadelphia Eagles’ quarterback position is a hot-button topic that’s dividing fans and analysts alike. But here’s where it gets controversial—could Jalen Hurts still be the starting QB in 2027, or is the team already eyeing his replacement? Let’s dive in.
The 2025-2026 season is officially in the books, and with Part II of our Eagles mailbag (check out Part I here: [link]), we’re tackling some of the most pressing questions on fans’ minds. One reader, @masonmoh2, throws a curveball: Gut prediction: Will Jalen Hurts be the Eagles' starting QB in 2027?
This question is a powder keg, and I’m not backing down from it. Yes, I firmly believe Jalen Hurts will still be under center for the Eagles in 2027. Let’s not forget, this is the same guy who was crowned Super Bowl MVP just a year ago and delivered a stellar 2024 playoff performance. We’re talking 71.4% completion rate, 5 touchdowns to just 1 interception, 8.0 yards per pass attempt, and 194 rushing yards with 5 touchdowns on the ground. He was the MVP runner-up in 2022 and dominated in the Eagles-Chiefs showdown. Hurts has proven he can elevate his game when it matters most.
But here’s the twist: 2025 was a down year for him. Bad habits resurfaced, his rushing threat diminished, and the offense suffered. Remember, this isn’t the first time Hurts has faced adversity—he’s bounced back before. Yet, the Eagles drafting a quarterback in the second round (as we discussed in our mock draft: [link]) raises eyebrows. Is it a safety net? A nudge for Hurts to step up? Or a sign of deeper concerns? And this is the part most people miss—Tanner McKee’s contract ends in 2027, so the Eagles will need a QB2 regardless. Drafting one could save them millions.
Now, let’s address the elephant in the room: Hurts’ reliance on his running ability. Last season, he seemed reluctant to use this part of his game, rushing for just 421 yards compared to over 600 in previous years. If Hurts isn’t maximizing his dual-threat talents, it’s fair to question his long-term value—especially when analysts compare him to other quarterbacks strictly as a passer. Jeremy Fowler from ESPN even hinted that the Eagles might draft a QB to apply pressure on Hurts. Could history repeat itself, with Hurts eventually being replaced, just like Carson Wentz?
Speaking of controversy, let’s shift to A.J. Brown. After reports surfaced that the Eagles hadn’t discussed trading him, fans are clinging to hope. But is Brown’s recent podcast appearance just a smokescreen to maintain his trade value? The Eagles have a history of obliging players who want out (Wentz, Ertz, Reddick, Huff), but they won’t settle for less than Brown’s worth. If a trade happens, it’ll be on their terms.
And what about DeVonta Smith? If Brown leaves, can Smith step into the spotlight? I say absolutely. Smith has the skills and mindset to be the focal point of the passing attack. In fact, I’d argue he’s been underutilized as the No. 2 option. Imagine what he could do with more targets.
Now, let’s tackle free agency and the draft. Howie Roseman is often accused of avoiding drafting for need, but that’s a myth. He’s a ‘needs attacker,’ trading up for top prospects at key positions. If Landon Dickerson, Lane Johnson, and A.J. Brown all exit, could the Eagles replace them in free agency? Unlikely. But here’s the kicker: Johnson and Dickerson are set to earn $41.7 million and $19 million, respectively, in 2026. Walking away from that seems improbable.
Lastly, a thought-provoking question: Should the Eagles draft a kicker to replace Jake Elliott? With a tough contract and underwhelming performance, it’s a valid debate. And if A.J. Brown is traded, could Romeo Doubs or other Packers free agents like Darian Kinnard or John FitzPatrick be on the Eagles’ radar?
So, here’s my challenge to you: Do you think Hurts will still be the starter in 2027, or is the writing on the wall for a change? And what’s your take on A.J. Brown’s future? Let’s hear it in the comments—agree or disagree, I want your thoughts!
